The necessity for change in the route of a relationship, a collaboration, teamwork or a larger-scale structure appears when some elements are more or less. When something appears, it often shows itself with signals, messages.
Because the few is evidence of many, and this is valid for every model of association.
What is coming sends its signals; maybe you are ignoring or saying now is not the time.
Small vibrations that have just appeared may indicate that the risk has increased, that cautious and safe sailing has been abandoned and that unregulated speed has been reached.
The higher the speed, the greater the danger. One by one, you lose sight of what is happening, the objects surrounding the universe of association. Yet, comfortable progress is possible only by feeling the awareness of what is happening and accepting what is coming. Otherwise, an uneasy, restless, anxious course of sailing occurs. And this tension is felt by its gradually increasing vibrations which can evolve into quakes if not prevented.
The solution to avoid this is to go faster to escape? Can new conditions make us forget or ignore previous ones?
Each incomplete process continues to appear in new forms in the following cases, until it is completed. Especially in institutions, unless each case is recorded and handled as a process to work on, it comes up again and again.
Who should be, just like a sensitive seismograph, to constantly handle and examine the small vibrations in each case and translate the possible scenarios sent by these signals into the language of relevant units in the institution? It is obvious that companies that can afford the hourly cost of this type of early warning system can avoid bigger disasters, right?
If the few is the evidence of many, isn’t it necessary to know that when we see the few, many will follow?
Comments